Fork of TeaVM for compiling the EaglercraftX 1.8 WASM GC runtime, and any clients built on it
Go to file
2013-12-12 20:59:05 +04:00
teavm-classlib Common subexpression elimination now works 2013-12-12 20:59:05 +04:00
teavm-core Common subexpression elimination now works 2013-12-12 20:59:05 +04:00
.gitignore Ignores eclipse files 2013-09-24 00:11:28 +04:00
pom.xml Doing a lot of things 2013-10-27 12:16:07 +04:00
README.md Extends brief project description 2013-12-12 15:35:18 +04:00

TeaVM

What is TeaVM?

In short, TeaVM gets a bytecode, running over JVM, and translates it to the JavaScript code, which does exactly the same thing as the original bytecode does. It is based on its cross-compiler which transforms class files to JavaScript. But there is something more:

  • a sophisticated per-method dependency manager, which greatly reduces the JavaScript output;
  • an optimizer capable of things like devirtualization, inlining, constant propagation, loop invariant motion and many other;
  • implementation of subset of core Java library;

Advantages over GWT

You may notice that TeaVM idea is much similar to GWT. So why we need TeaVM instead of GWT?

Unlinke GWT, TeaVM gets the compiled bytecode, not Java sources. Thereby it does not depend on a specific language syntax. Even not on a specific language. So, when the next Java version gets a new feature, you can use it in your source code and TeaVM compiler remains unbroken. Also you may want thigs Scala, Kotlin or Ceilon. TeaVM supports them.

To represent a source code, GWT uses abstract syntax trees (AST). TeaVM uses control flow graph (CFG) of methods. CFG are much easier to optimize, so TeaVM applies aggressive optimizations to you code to make it running faster.

Advantages over JavaScript

JavaScript suffers of its dynamic typing. When you write a new code, dynamic typing accelerates the development process, allowing you to write less boilerplate code. But when you are to maintain a large code base, you may need static typing. Also, it is not dynamic typing that really makes code short. Good static typed languages can infer variable types for you. And they usually have a lot more useful features like lambda functions, lexical closures, implicit type casting, etc.

With JavaScript you sometimes have to include large library for only one feature. Or you include many different libraries for different purposes and your project size grows. TeaVM translates only the methods which are really needed. So you can depend on as much libraries as you want and get

With JavaScript you are limited to one language. TeaVM supports many of the JVM languages.